minus-squareairrowOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoI don’t think warmongering is a better look, or that WW2 couldn’t have been resolved contrary to non-interventionist policy, as it was the dominant U.S. policy up until that time: https://infogalactic.com/info/United_States_non-interventionism
minus-squareawwwyissss@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 months agoSupporting Ukrainian freedom to prevent Europe spiraling into WW3 isn’t war mongering.
minus-squareairrowOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoDo you think possibly waging war by the U.S. being involved with Ukraine would make WW3 more likely? That’s what a lot of people think contrarily
minus-squareawwwyissss@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 months agoI think it makes it less likely. If the Kremlin is stopped in Ukraine it makes it unlikely they’ll continue their aggression. The comparison many people make to Czechoslovakia in 1939 is appropriate.
minus-squaremojofrododojo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoI think you are a pogue who’s willing to sell women and children to Putin if it makes your life a tiny bit simpler. Despicable.
I don’t think warmongering is a better look, or that WW2 couldn’t have been resolved contrary to non-interventionist policy, as it was the dominant U.S. policy up until that time: https://infogalactic.com/info/United_States_non-interventionism
Supporting Ukrainian freedom to prevent Europe spiraling into WW3 isn’t war mongering.
Do you think possibly waging war by the U.S. being involved with Ukraine would make WW3 more likely? That’s what a lot of people think contrarily
I think it makes it less likely. If the Kremlin is stopped in Ukraine it makes it unlikely they’ll continue their aggression.
The comparison many people make to Czechoslovakia in 1939 is appropriate.
I think you are a pogue who’s willing to sell women and children to Putin if it makes your life a tiny bit simpler.
Despicable.