Given how many people treat speed limits as suggestions, at best, having your vehicle obey the limit would turn some people off of them.

    • cuchilloc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Guess you’ve never been to South America, Need for Speed Underground2 soundtrack starts playing on busses betweeen 22:00 and 5:00, optional bonus: your driver is bald and wearing a tanktop-

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think they’re making the point that in lots of places where public transit is good, people use it just because they then don’t have to deal with traffic and driving themselves.

  • Venat0r@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    Does it bother you if the driver is driving slowly when you’re a passenger though? I don’t think most people will care that much if thier self driving car follows the speed limit.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    If self-driving cars got to the point where they were significantly safer than human drivers (a big if), I could see the creation of dedicated self-driving lanes with higher speed limits.

    • ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      That sounds like dedicated bus lanes, except you don’t need the higher speed limits since avoiding traffic takes care of the need to speed.

      Now we just wait until some tech bro picks up the idea and resells it with AI in the name at 10x the cost to tax payers.

      • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The difference with buses is that they’re less safe (or at least less able to avoid collisions) at high speed than cars are. So the purpose of bus lanes isn’t to increase the maximum speed of buses, but to increase their minimum speed during congestion.

        • ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I guess my point is that they would similarly get people to their destination quicker if implemented. The main difference is that one is fully proven and exists already with current technology.

          • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Agreed—and to be clear, I’m not advocating for self-driving lanes. But I think one of the potential motivations for the creation of such lanes is that human drivers would feel more comfortable if they weren’t sharing lanes with self-driving cars, just like they feel more comfortable not sharing lanes with buses. And by the same token, bus drivers and self-driving cars aren’t going to want to share lanes with each other, so there would be pressure to have different lanes for each type of traffic.

  • EndOfLine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ride share is very popular and it offers a similar service to what most people expect from self driving cars.

    I think that the majority of people want a vehicle for transportation and those who want a car for recreation are a minority.

  • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    If there was 100% adoption of self-driving vehicles with a inter-vehicle communication network, there is no reason why the left lane couldn’t go 100+ mph. There still would be lower speeds outside of the highway, but they could be substantially higher than today on most major roads.

    Human drivers are why speed limits exist. People follow too close, people are impatient, people are aggressive, people are risky, people don’t know what the vehicles in front of them are going to do, people don’t use turn signals, people hit the brakes and cut across multiple lanes of traffic because they weren’t paying attention or missed their exit, etc.

    Networked autonomous cars can communicate and collaborate, allowing for faster and safer travel. The left lane could have no speed limit because every car using it, leaving it, or entering it are all in agreement on what needs to be done and what to do and when to do it. Cars on major roads would slow down so another car can turn without causing the cars behind it to stop. Oncoming cars could slow to allow for an opening that a turning car can use instead of waiting for an opening in irregular traffic, or taking a risky turn that causes an accident.

    Getting to that system will require laws against manual driving and mandating that all new vehicles have full autonomous driving. I hope I am dead before that happens because that future sounds awful to me.

    • Num10ck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      safety.
      system components fail, debris winds up on a path, etc.
      100 mph crash is just way less survivable. stopping distance is a function of speed. speed limits are also for human passengers.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m a speeder, but only because I want to be driving as little as possible. Driving is the bullshit that occurs in between the other things I need to do.