• smiling_big_baby_boy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Amerikkka should not exist. It must be abolished. There are concessions the State & capital will adhere to when we mobilize, but revolution will never be on the ballot.

    Domination is a byproduct of coercive hierarchy. To free ourselves from domination we have to be strategic in how we interact with systems of power. Non-reformist reforms can improve our material conditions in the short term, but true liberation is only achieved when we abolish all States, abolish Capitalism and abolish hierarchy.

    We don’t have to bargain for our humanity. We have the capacity to collectively organize and care for ourselves and the environment.

    • Addv4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Checks and balances would be the executive and judicial branches, not the senate.

      • Wooki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        You think the executive has power? Haha

        No senate has powers beyond policy, inquiry committees to reviel corruption ect list goes on. Checks Nd balances

        • Addv4@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          No, that is the original meaning of having three branches, the legislative, the executive, and the judicial. If any of them are not doing their job the other two branches are supposed to hold them accountable (supposed to being the operative term here). I was just saying that the senate was not established as a system of checks and balances against the house of Representatives, but rather as a compromise so that smaller states wouldnt necessarily be completely beholden to one’s with much larger populations.

    • drathvedro@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Russia just did three day voting on friday, saturday and sunday to make sure that both 9-5 and 2 over 2 could have a day off to vote. The downside is that it was very expensive as the staff gotta be paid more than thrice the amount, it was very taxing on volunteer observers, and ultimately useless as they’ve made up whatever numbers they wanted using the unverifyable electronic voting in the end.

        • drathvedro@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          No, lmao, but can’t deny Russia has some nice things, even though by having those it is shooting itself in the foot. Like 2012 elections where they’ve basically said “Look, we have the entire election committee in the bag - еhey can draw us whatever results we want. But, let’s try to legitimize those elections in the eyes of the people! Let’s put a camera on every single polling station and let anyone watch them online, so that everyone can see how fair our elections are!”. As you might imagine, during the election, all social medias got completely flooded by recordings of voting fraud… And yes, people instantly noticed that the price for those cameras was like 10x of their market value, with 90% of costs landing straight into government officials pockets…

  • CaptainProton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    MANDATORY voting… Let’s be real, we have people who are unable to read the candidates’ personal statements, you really want them voting?

    That’ll be used to get President Camacho legislating Mandatory plant watering using Gatorade.