Why are knife control laws so strong in the United States as opposed to gun control?

I was realizing it would be nice to have a knife with auto opening for boxes, etc., basically a switch blade or similar, and I found out that they are super illegal in my state (and/or there are length restrictions, or both sides of the blade can’t be sharp, etc), but I can go into a sporting goods store and buy a pistol and ammo in under 30min.

Shooting open an Amazon box seems inefficient. What is up with restrictive knife-control laws??

  • ChadCMulligan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 months ago

    The workaround is to buy a small handgun for concealed carry and then attach a small switchblade bayonet.

    Your right to open boxes shall not be infringed

  • Geek_King@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 months ago

    When a moral panic happens, a lot of things get blown out of proportion. A good example was the panic relating to D&D and satanism. There was a huge panic sometime in the 50s or 60s about the police dealing with young thugs with concealed switch blades, which could be hidden, and then deployed one handed so fast a cop couldn’t draw his weapon fast enough. So this panic got a lot of laws drawn up to ban any switch blade.

    Since then, the there are knives that skirt the law by not having a spring which force the blade open, instead a tension bar. There are still types are illegal to carry if a Cop would find out you have it, like “Out the front” switch knives.

    The stupid part is, there are plenty of “one hand deployable” knives on the market that are 100% legal. But the laws never get revisited. In my state it’s illegal to have a out the front switch blade, yet a bunch of high end OTF knives are for sale at a sporting store. They just post a sign that says “Know your local laws”, which some how makes it okay to sell.

    If anyone has more to add, or corrects, let me know.

    • Thurstylark@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      The arbitrarity of some states’ knife laws is also a problem. I don’t remember which state (OK pre ~2015 law updates perhaps?), but I read about one that had few carry restrictions below a certain blade size (somewhere in the neighborhood of 3 inches, IIRC), and if you’re caught carrying one over the limit, you basically have to give a specific purpose for having it. Assuming your case goes to trial, this means it’s more or less up to the judge to determine if your use was valid, which is juuuuuuuussst flexible enough to persecute the “right” people. (assuming I’m remembering correctly that this was in Oklahoma, that would be Native Americans)

      Switching gears; Some More News had a pretty comprehensive video about moral panics, which also includes some history on switchblades in particular, for those interested.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you look at the timing of most the laws against specific types of knives… you’re going to notice a pattern where there was some scare involving some minority or alt group.

    Switch blades were outlaws after Hollywood depicted African American villains as gangsters with them.

    Same with ballisongs and Asian gangsters/villians.

    All of that said, auto-openers have a hair trigger and I would suggest instead getting a good flipper you can easily flick open. Benchmade bugout is my EDC (not for fighting, it’s light and solid.)

  • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    There are actually some legal movements to reduce unnecessary knife laws, because a lot of them are based around the idea of 50s punks and don’t make actual logical sense.

    But yeah, it depends entirely on the state. The only knife laws in my state is you can’t conceal carry a Bowie knife, but all other knives (OTF, automatics, balisongs, etc) are legal.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    They aren’t: This is 100% state dependent. Some states have extremely permissive laws allowing you to carry anything from a switchblade to a greatsword if you want.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yes, and gun laws are state dependent as well. I’m not talking about federal law (though technically the Federal Switchblade Act of 1958 is still in force), I’m saying that arguably the majority of states in the United States have more permissive gun laws than knife laws, and it’s absurd.

      • theyoyomaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Most of the truly ridiculous knife laws are in states with equally ridiculous gun laws. A few have been challenged under 2A grounds with some degree of success but it just isn’t being pursued that much.

  • Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    The US has strong knife laws? I carry a knife almost everyday and this is the first I’m hearing of this. The only time I can’t take my knife somewhere is if no weapons at all are allowed there, like government buildings.

    • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m my state there are restrictions, but they are pretty much accessory charges that you won’t get unless you are a dipshit. You do have to have a firearms permit to carry an automatic knife though, I am not aware of anybody getting charged with that and that alone.

      What is funny is you can have a ka-bar on your belt not concealed and be fine, but you aren’t suppose to carry a pocketknife with a blade over 3.5". Also if the fixed blade knife is sharpened on both sides of the blade, that is a no-no, but if it folds it is fine. I think they just removed the ban on butterfly knifes or it has the firearms permit exemption now, but I would have to check to confirm.

      As you can imagine, the gun laws make about as much sense and don’t do much to help the problem of violence.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      What state do you live in? You might be surprised to find you are technically breaking the law. Or you’re just carrying a simple little folding knife.

      • Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I went looking at every state I’ve lived in and the one with the most restrictions was Texas, obviously states like New York or California will be more restrictive, but the only real restrictions that I found outside of new england / California, were switchblades or “automatic opening knives”, and carrying in locations like schools and government buildings, which I expected. I used to carry a 8” hunting knife (13” overall) when I did a bunch of outdoor work, now I carry a smaller 3” folding pocketknife (6” overall).

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It depends on the state, my state has almost no knife laws, but in New York (for example) nearly all folding knives are technically considered illegal gravity knives. Basically if you open a knife 99% of the way, and are able to flick it the remaining 1% open it’s considered an illegal gravity knife.

      It’s pretty dumb.

  • rhythmisaprancer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    I suspect it is because knives are not included in the second amendment of the constitution. That is a pretty easy argument for people to use against gun regulation (whether or fair or not), but there is no such thing for knives.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Knives are included in “arms.” In 2008, the Supreme Court ruled in Heller that the term “arms” has the same meaning as it did in the 18th century and includes anything that can be used for defense, carried for offensive or defensive action, or used to strike another person.

      • radix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Laws on the books generally don’t get overturned unless they are specifically mentioned in a court ruling, or there is some action by a legislative body. If you want to be able to buy/sell switchblades, you could challenge the law and see where it goes. But apparently nobody has bothered to take it to court.

      • rhythmisaprancer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Wow, thanks for sharing that! So much for my thought… It makes yours more poignant though. Perhaps it is just a matter of obsession? Are the folks who obsess over firearms different than the folks who obsess over knives?

        • WoahWoah@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I would say so, though while looking at reviews for a new pocket knife, I realized there’s a lot of obsessed people who, like gun people, think owning knives is a personality.

  • bestagon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Just get one anyway. It won’t do you any favors if a cop finds it but knife control isn’t a big priority for most law enforcement

    EDIT: I am not a lawyer

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Very old laws on the books that no one has bothered to change in some states. Federally, they aren’t illegal. Federally, knives weren’t protected under the 2nd amendment so states had an easier time putting rules in place against them, and many did. My state just legalized otf and switch blades for everyone a few years ago. Mainly because unassisted knives were able to become just as quick and easy to open, it was a bit silly to leave assisted open knives not legal.

    As an added note just for you: cardboard is hell on knife blades and they’ll dull them very quickly. I’d get yourself a box knife and blades f9r it if you open a lot of boxes, unless you want to sharpen a knife like twice a week.

  • clif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Depends on the state. Down here there are pretty much zero restrictions except with an asterisk that it’s illegal to harm someone with them… AKA, an extra charge of you’re a dick and stab someone.

    I’ve been carrying an “out the front automatic” for the last few years.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s kinda funny that they’re like knives are cool unless you stab someone with one. If only we had other laws covering the legality of stabbing someone. 😁

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because knives are the weapon of choice of poor people and abuse victims that are lashing out while guns are favored by the white dudes

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The weapon of choice of poor people? 12x more violent crime is committed using firearms than knives in the United States. You may be under the impression that all guns are expensive, but that’s not the case.

      Also, your post implicitly categorizes people of color as poor, abused, knife-wielding criminals. That seems like a long, convoluted way to be racist, but you do you.

      You were trying so hard to make this a race/class issue that you accidentally did a racism. 🤣

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Pointing out that white men are a privileged class the law and especially law enforcement caters to is not in fact a racism.

        • WoahWoah@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s true. But implying non-white people are poor, abused, and knife-wielding criminals is. You just structured your comment in a clumsy matter, it’s fine. The conversation went somewhere more interesting and involved without you.