• Striker@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Despite reports I have decided to keep the comments open and the post up. I think removing this will only add fuel to the fire.

  • leraje@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Might be worth remembering here that Lemmy instances, including .world are hosted by regular people. Not massive multinational companies worth billions who can engage the best legal talent around.

    If Hollywood comes after a Lemmy instance, Holywood have a huge legal team and endless money. The Lemmy instance has some guy. They could quite literally destroy a persons life. With that in mind, I don’t blame any instance owners for erring on the side of taking a stance that won’t put them in the legal firing line.

    • moitoi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For me, it looks like people are mad at the US defaultism of the decision.

      I understand why. It makes for part of the users no sense as they are protected by the law. It looks like a US “shitshow”. Countries are protecting the IP of the person, making it nearly impossible to pursue someone. Others have law allowing the use and the copy of copyrighted material for educational purposes. Some allow the download of copyrighted material.

      It’s the same with GDPR. Meta must comply. There is no exception because US defaultism.

      And we can understand this point of view too. It’s not binary as the US people think it is. It’s more mixed depending of the country.


      Generally, outside of this drama, on the internet, people are reclaiming they right and don’t want the US “example” anymore. They want the internet following their local laws like the GDPR for Europeans. They have the right to claim it. Thanks to GDPR, mandatory usb-c, battery replacement and others laws in Europe and outside, the consciences of are awakened that the US is not the model to follow in terms of law on the internet and technologies.

      • SRo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. .world is just afraid of everything. Better they shut down their instance.

    • RadButNotAChad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a well reasoned answer. If this were my instance I would also ban communities linking to pirated software. A single lawsuit and lawyer bill for a regular guy, and that can fuck your life up all because you tried to run a decent community. I have a username I use for browsing lemmynsfw, I’ll make one for browsing piracy related things too.

  • snickers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some of the comments in here are a fucking disgrace and a disappointment.

    I just shut down my own self-hosted instance the other week because of legal concerns. Caching anything and everything that gets pushed to my server and basically having to put all my faith in other admins taking care of illegal stuff in a timely manner was stressful and not worth the risk. And that was a solo instance!

    It’s only a matter of time until lawyers backed by millions of dollar come knocking on the door of lemmy admins and I can’t fault lw for being pro-active. Whether or not it’s legal in your jurisdiction to host communities like this doesn’t matter at all if you’re not the one with a name attached to the server. Even wrongful legal claims by copyright holders are costly and time intensive to fight back against.

    Why should a private person who hosts an instance for thousands of users for free subject themselves to such a risk?

  • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wtf dbzero was a huge proponent of the fediverse and has been a part of the recent swell in users. I don’t agree with this decision at all

    • cerevant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Remember that lemmy.world has to keep a copy of whatever content appears in a federated community on their servers, making them legally liable for the content. At least they just blocked the community instead of defederating.

  • FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is probably the best option for Lemmy.world. It’s not being run by a big company, after all. Normal people often get screwed when their servers have anything related to piracy on them.

  • xaon_rider92@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s unfortunate, but it’s kinda understandable why they chose to do so. The admins are just a bunch of regular people, they may not have the financial security to risk the legal issues that could come from having any sort of piracy related content.

    I guess I’ll just be using my alt acc for piracy stuff.