An Australian museum excluded men from an exhibit to highlight misogyny. A man sued for access and won.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/mkwF8

  • doctortofu@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Protesting misogyny through misandry - what a fabulous idea! Next, how about a protest against childhood obesity by starving a couple of kids to death?

    Doing a shitty thing to protest a different shitty thing only multiplies the amount of shit instead of reducing it…

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not really a fan of the whole “we’ll be intolerant so you know what it feels like” but it’s also the only way I can really know what it feels like as a white man from a middle class family. I’m on the fence on this one.

    • pleasejustdie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      They should just make it a small art exhibit out front, then 2 bathrooms, the mens is normal, with some basic art, but the women’s bathroom has a bar and cocktail lounge and the extra amenities. Then the business wouldn’t be excluding men, it would just be providing them a different experience in the bathroom which I feel like they’d have a much better time defending in court. But it also seems like this whole thing was done as a form of activism and it looks like one of the intents is for this business to close down so they can be martyrs.

    • psivchaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      The more interesting thing to me is… They were modeling a thing that was popular in the 60s, according to the article. It’s an art display to protest something from 60+ years ago. A lot of the people who would go to such an exhibit weren’t alive, and certainly weren’t adults at the time.

      There are surely problems that women face today but I don’t see how this helps shine any light on that or does anything at all for it.

  • moistclump@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sometimes I believe women’s only spaces need to exist for some instances of women who experienced trauma to feel safe and be able to start their healing without their nervous systems taking over.

    However, this doesn’t sound like that. This sounds like exclusion.

  • dellish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Perhaps women should take on The Melbourne Club next and see how quickly men change their mind on the subject?

    I understand the guy’s argument in this case seems to be the fact he bought a ticket at the same price as a woman but was excluded from one of the exhibits, but the overarching point of sexual discrimination works both ways.

  • quindraco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    There is. Arizona has slavery without having people own people - you’re completely failing to address the horrors of compulsory labor.