I have seen many comments saying that lemmy.world sucks, and sh.itjust.works is good. I have seen that lemmy.world apparently has a very poor reputation among other instances. Why? After a quick look, sh.itjust.works doesn’t look much different to me. Can anyone explain?

Edit: many good replies. the conclusion I’m drawing is that for my purposes it doesn’t really matter. I appreciate everyone who responded

  • .Donuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    3 days ago

    Here’s the description by both:

    sh.itjust.works:

    A bilingual (EN/FR) general-purpose instance located in eastern Canada! Powered by 99% renewable energy! Everyone is welcome eh.

    Lemmy.World:

    A generic Lemmy server for everyone to use. (…) Lemmy.World is a general-purpose Lemmy instance of various topics, for the entire world to use

    The comments about instances being “good” or “bad” is just plain ol’ tribalism.

    Users get attacked for the instances they registered to, even if they were unaware of instance politics when they actually registered. That sucks!

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Lemmy world has more users and therefore more likely to have more jerks when the jerk to not jerk ratio within an instance is the same.

      There are/were a few instances where staying with their registration is worthy of assuming the worst about them.

  • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    3 days ago

    I agree with you. IMO, it’s not that different.

    The big difference is between the tankie LARPer instances (lemmygrad, hexbear, parts of lemmy.ml) and the rest of the major instances.

    • zante@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      As a socialist, you will understand I’m sure that constant being slurred with “tANkiE” from mostly .world users is very tiring

      • Naryn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 minutes ago

        Says the person who has massive amounts of Antisemitic hatred and are quite happy to full on blow Putin’s dick whilst spouting his propaganda I’m not shocked you’re being called a Tankie

        • zante@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          They used a political slur against entire servers and on the left, there is a concept of solidarity.

          • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            35
            ·
            3 days ago

            Solidarity with authoritarians has a long and sordid history of betrayal and being lined up against walls in the end. Anarchists have had to learn that lesson in the most brutal of ways.

            • Eldritch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              22
              ·
              3 days ago

              Yep. They only tolerate you as long as you’re useful. As long as you don’t push back against their mass incarceration, assassination, and even genocide. Authoritarians are authoritarian first. Left or right is a distant afterthought.

              • Naryn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 minutes ago

                Authoritarians are bad but lemme just stick up for Russia and Iran mmmkay.

      • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        3 days ago

        There’s a difference between being a socialist, and blindly defending authoritarian regimes that claim they are socialist. Those instances earned their reputation for a reason.

        • zante@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          Make it a stickie, because barely anyone observes this definition.

          I am regularly slurred as Russian bot or a tANkiE when calling for peace and de-escalation of war.

          Daily .

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            34
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Have you stopped to consider that maybe you’re just an asshole?

            No, seriously, you’re whining about being called a tankie when… like dude, you’re a tankie. Half your comments are just bringing up how EU/UK support for Ukraine’s defense is a frivolous waste or similar. I doubt you think of yourself like this but to an outside observer you’re deeply toxic.

            • zante@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              3 days ago

              … the root of the problem is your apparent compulsion to call people “toxic” and “assholes” for having different views.

              • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                20
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Ah yes, the “no u” gambit. Classic, deadly, refined. The most elegant of rebuttals. A refuge for only the sharpest of wits.

                Anyways, do you mean different views like say, someone holding different (and by your own admission, quite common) opinions about how your conduct reflects on your character…?

              • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                3 days ago

                They’re not calling you that for having different views. They’re calling you that for making up reasons to offend yourself and acting like a toxic drama queen. And the ratio shows they aren’t alone.

                • zante@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  And what is your reason for adding your personal attack to this already well populated debate ?

      • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        3 days ago

        There’s a huge difference between a tankie and a socialist:

        • Socialist supports economic policy aimed at just distribution of resources
        • Tankie supports fascist-like authoritarianism under a mask of socialism
          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Uh… Yeah, it does. It literally defines the meaning and the context in which the term is used. Thats… how language works. Fundementally.

            • zante@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Goodness me, you are being difficult today.

              I think you can appreciate, that no one user’s definition - no matter how agreeable you and I might find it - speaks to everyone’s definition of the same term.

              Especially when we are talking about colloquial slur, like tankie, which isn’t in main dictionaries.

              • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Sure, but it does speak to that user’s definition, which is what they were talking about. And honestly, their definition is pretty much the standard. ‘A pejorative term for supporters of authoritarian regimes, particularly communist ones’ is the definition in some form across every site I’ve turned up in the thirty seconds I spent on this. It’s what everyone else in this thread appears to be using. Seems like its pretty agreed on.

      • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        It’s fair to call people who white-wash authoritarianism, genocide and roleplay as communists tankies.

        This is not a matter of different opinions. They openly support the russian invasion, the atrocities of the russian occupation and reject Ukrainian identity and self-determination.

        It’s the literal definition of the word.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    .world is the instance where most new users default to so and it has the highest user base and that includes a lot of trolls or just bad faith actors. Also, a lot of .world is based from reddit users who left and they brought that kind of mindset along. Some people don’t like that either.

    • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      What does it matter which users are on which server, since we all get the same content anyways, aside from defederation?

      • [R3D4CT3D]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        it really doesn’t. those that make it about server handles are the reason movements fail, like get over yourself, ppl! hexbear came @ me pretty hard for my instance. fuck em.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Your account may be banned by the admins if they don’t like you. If it’s on your home instance, you lose the entire account. That’s why it’s important to create your account on a trustworthy instance (or host your own).

      • Sundial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        It doesn’t, except for the ones who like to browse local. And the .world admins have quite a few blocked instances. They seem to be a bit too liberal in defederating to my tastes. I feel as if it runs against the concept of federation itself.

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    They are just two different servers. Lemmy.World is one of the really big ones. I had an account there but because of the size there were a lot of performance issues. I would recommend you join one of the smaller servers like sh.itjust.works. You have access to almost all the same information on the Fediverse.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      You’ll miss out on the Beehaw community on Lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works, since Beehaw defederated from them

      Lemmy.cafe is a nice general purpose instance that only defederates from the most extreme instances, while still giving access to Beehaw and all other instances. It’s still small too, so it’d more effectively spread the load compared to creating an account on sh.itjust.works, which already has a pretty huge user count.

  • TGhost [She/Her]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    To those who promotes lemmy.cafe as a solution,
    No shame that the instance doesnt block far rights and pedo instances ?

    Start considerate your self at a moment,

    Not every leftists are for imperialisms… True leftists are humanists, and want the right for people to get autodetermination,

    At a moment, stop being ridiculous,

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Basically none. Both are mainstream instances, not practicing any extreme moderation policy.

    You might have confused lemmy.world with lemmy.ml which does have some communities with bad reputation.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    I have seen that lemmy.world apparently has a very poor reputation among other instances.

    It’s the largest by far, with five times the monthly active population of #2. One of the main things people want out of federated systems is decentralization, and having one huge dominant server goes against that goal.

    I should note .world wasn’t the biggest when I signed up. I picked it because mastodon.world was a known quantity, which led me to believe the same team would run a stable server.

  • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    So far my experience with sh.itjust.works has been shit. I was banned from a community there for “vibes”.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Most servers don’t micromanage community moderation. That sort of thing could happen almost anywhere.