• 200ok@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer Kent Walker, says the DOJ is pushing “a radical interventionist agenda that would harm Americans and America’s global technology leadership.”

    I’m honestly curious how this would “harm Americans”.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Google pretending they have any other nationality other then “the global internet” is cute in a disgusting way.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I refuse to call any Billionaires Americans. A billionaire in America has far more in common with a billionaire in Ireland or France than with working class Americans. They don’t use our schools, drink our water, drive our roads, or rely on our safety nets. They don’t take out the trash, do their laundry, wait 6 months for a doctor’s appointment, or stress over defunding their retirement to pay for needed medication.

        Billionaire involvement in politics should be considered foreign interference. Of course AIPAC is foreign interference too, but apparently that’s not a problem either.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      …a radical interventionist agenda…

      That language seems very “Trump-esque”, and I doubt it is a coincidence.

    • nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      How does chrome make money? It uses ads from Google, chrome on it’s own is not a business.

      Say you buy chrome, you have to options

      1. Ads built into chrome itself (when you’re in the settings menu, homepage, reading a PDF, playing the dino game)

      2. Force your own default search engine, or get a company like Google or Bing to pay you for the privilege of being a default search engine.

      Neither of these options are better than the status quo

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The same ruling would ban Google from paying other browsers to make Google the default search engine.
      This would kill Firefox and make Chromium the only browser engine that’s left.

      • ferret@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        30 days ago

        It would leave the newly-split-off chrome in the same financial situation as firefox. Arguably a worse one.