• airrowOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    article:

    After studying more than 4,600 Burmese and reticulated pythons on commercial farms in Vietnam and Thailand, they found the snakes had a more efficient food conversion ratio than salmon, pigs, cows, chicken and crickets. The snakes went long periods without eating but did not lose much of their body mass as a result; they also required very little water. On top of all that, they ate food that would not have been used otherwise, known as waste meat, such as wild-caught rodents and stillborn pigs.

    says more in article like that. and yet:

    Scientists also say more research needs to be conducted on the nutritional content of snake meat, as well as the broader environmental implications—and potential ripple effects—of commercial python farms.

    • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      More research into the ripple effects

      is doing a lot of heavy lifting there.

      Pythons are a problem in Florida, I’m not arguing against that. Building a profit motive around them is counter productive to lessening their ecological impact.