Incapable of expressing your option?

What do you get out of judging people for spending their own money?

That Trump sucking Clinton’s dick (both the homosexuality and the fact that it’s a Clinton) would be more damaging to his base than raping children is really disturbing.

It is a perfectly placed ad.

True, but my point was more of that the referendum does not seek to give advantage to Democrats.

Perhaps naïvely, I have a small degree of hope that the overall electric being unhappy with the Republicans might actually backfire on their redistricting plans.

It’s journalistic malpractice that the title of this article suggests the California referendum will be what tips control of Congress. Congress is tipped, the California referendum only seeks to right it.

“Bag” is charitable.

There is a certain type of person who fanboys out toward Apple, and a certain type of person who buys things to show off as status symbols. I don’t think those types overlap much these days, which is why we’re seeing the iPhone Air fail.

“The New War Crimes” works better out loud than it does written down (say it out loud with an emphasis on crimes) but is so apt I’d like to see it catch on.

To be fair, it’s certainly felt like longer than only one year since the last election.

The California one is defensive, and exists as an annulment of Texas’ undemocratic redistributing.

Republican states are going to do it anyway. And they won’t put it to vote (like California had.)

It’s an optional service, not baked into the core product.

I’m the “anti-ai” person in my group of friends. Which isn’t strictly true, I’m bearish on AI, not wholly anti. I find Kagi’s separation appropriate, and actually finds some use (and better results than ChatGPT) with their AI assistant. It’s particularly useful for me debugging simple scripts and excel formulas.

It isn’t perfect overall, but well worth the few bucks each month. It’s one of the only subscriptions I’m not actively trying to get rid of.

When the alternative is the republicans? Ya.

So, an imaginary candidate is preferred over Newsom, imperfect as he is?

Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. Republicans don’t, which is why they’re in power.

Champion the overtly and successfully progressive when they’re available, and the less progressive to be better.

Here in the real world we need candidates who are electable.

deleted by creator

They named a bedroom after Lincoln, and as far as I know it has an attached bathroom.

You would think if the immigration hot bed of California were boosting the numbers, we wouldn’t have lost two seats in the 2020 sentences.

Snow White (1937)
Cinderella (1950)
Sleeping Beauty (1959)
The Little Mermaid (1989)
Beauty and the Beast (1991)
Aladdin (1992)
Pocahontas (1995)
Mulan (1998)
~~Rodgers & Hammerstein’s Cinderella(1997) ~< ~~Enchanted (2007) ~~ Princess and the Frog (2009)
Tangled (2010)
~<Brave (2012) ~~ Frozen (2013)
~~Maleficent (2014) << ~~Cinderella (2015) ~~ Moana (2016)

You can’t include the live action remakes, and under no circumstances can you count 1997s Rodgers & Hammerstein’s Cinderella(1997) tv movie.

The answer is that there is a law, The Uniform Time Act.

Ad to why we just don’t ignore it, I’m sure it’s because the support for it just isn’t strong enough to merit ignoring a federal law.

That’s a banger, I like it. Had not heard of him, but I’ll seek more out. Thanks.