• mEEGal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 days ago

    sounds cool.

    I want to say “what’s the catch” but I’m also tired of being alert all the time

    • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Google sticks to their promised update lifecycle (which was 2 years for some devices, but 7 years after release for recent ones). Samsung seems to have a decent support lifecycle too these days, but I’ve noticed that at the end of the lifecycle Samsung tends to switch from monthly to quarterly updates and not all security patches are always included.

      For other vendors, the vendor does need to actually put the Qualcomm code in new updates. If you buy Oppo or Sony, that means you may not receive updates despite the SoC and upstream Android being supported. On the other hand, Google has been pulling more and more components out of base Android so they can be updated independently, so it’s possible things like GPU drivers may receive security updates even if vendors stop supporting phones.

      However, with this news, willing vendors can provide prolonged support, so as long as you verify on the vendors’ web page that you’ll receive updates, you’ll probably get them (“vendor” including the brand, but also the carrier if you’re buying a phone through a carrier for some reason).

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    Thats really awesome. I hope we also get replaceable batteries so our phones can actually last 8 years.

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Goes to show the different standards for different device types. MS is getting a beating out of stopping Windows 10 updates for some users after a decade.

    I want to say I get why and that my phones cycle faster than my PCs, but these days I’m not sure that’s the case.