• mako@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Who is the intended audience of that comment that you believe will equate sources of food and water to swasticars?

    • SaltSong@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      He didn’t say “swasticars.” He said “property.” Property damage can absolutely be violence against civilians.

      My audience would be anyone tempted to think that planting a burning cross in the yard of a black family does not count as violence against civilians, because it’s just property damage.

          • Retropunk64@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            There’s a difference between feeling threatened by something happening nearby and somebody threatening you. Karen might feel threatened because she saw someone break into her nighbors car, but she’s not being threatened.

      • mako@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Hahahaha, you went and one-upped your own stupid comment. Yes, clearly any rational person sees vandalizing swasticars to be just as evil as destroying essential infrastructure for human survival or terrorizing innocent people with racial hatred that has historically let to their murders.

        You’re a fucking idiot cosplaying as an iNTelLecTuAl.

        You’re also blocked because you’re a waste of everyone’s time.

      • guldukat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I wonder where you were when that guy showed up and beat Paul Pelosi almost to death with a hammer. Laughing probably, along with most Republicans

        • SaltSong@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Why do you think that? Because I’m trying to get us to make a sensible argument rather than a simple, incorrect argument?