Sounds like an issue with their work force. Without placing my tin foil hat on they need to hire more people to moderate and clean TOS breaking content.
puts tinfoil hat on
Meta is purposefully allowing far right militias to organize because a libertarian/conservative hellscape would mean their corporation becomes one of the largest fiefdoms.
There’s way more police and sheriff’s departments on Facebook than 100.
Tell me again how TikTok is dangerous, but Facebook is just grandmas sharing recipes.
Jan 6 has entered the chat
On Facebook… So there’s a clear trail of who is planning what and who is agreeing to go along. People with long histories of posting far right content, so when they inevitably cry “but a leftist plant orchestrated all this” there is evidence to the contrary.
Care saying “far right.” On Lemmy some of the users will tell you that the Democratic party is “far right.”
You don’t need to agree with what they post but it should be protected under free speech. This isn’t China
I also think people these days can’t stand seeing anything they don’t agree with. All people see is the stuff tailored to them and there is no discomfort
The far left are coordinating on Lemmy. At the end of the day as long as they aren’t committing a crime you can’t and shouldn’t do anything about it.
Racism is still free speech which sucks but the alternative is high censorship and fear
Racism is still free speech which sucks but the alternative is high censorship and fear
This is incorrect, and only serves those who target marginalized groups.
I wanna make it very clear that the conclusion that restriction of hate speech is a slippery slope for freedom of speech is not a given or universally held position
You can absolutely introduce laws prohibiting hate speech without introducing high censorship or fear. Many countries have laws prohibiting hate speech, including most European countries and a majority of, what Wikipedia calls, developed democracies.
Even countries that don’t have limits for hate inducing speech towards marginalized groups, with reference to the importance of freedom of speech, rarely have complete freedom of speech.
As an example, the US limits to freedom of speech include “fraud, child pornography, speech integral to illegal conduct, speech that incites imminent lawless action, and regulation of commercial speech such as advertising.”
The claim that intolerance to intolerance is dangerous, only serves the spread of intolerance.
The paradox of tolerance states that if a society’s practice of tolerance is inclusive of the intolerant, intolerance will ultimately dominate, eliminating the tolerant and the practice of tolerance with them.
Rosenfeld contrasts the approach to hate speech between Western European democracies and the United States, pointing out that among Western European nations, extremely intolerant or fringe political materials (e.g. Holocaust denial) are characterized as inherently socially disruptive, and are subject to legal constraints on their circulation as such,[13] while the US has ruled that such materials are protected by the principle of freedom of speech and cannot be restricted, except when endorsements of violence or other illegal activities are made explicit.
It’s only a bad thing when it’s people I don’t agree with.
I just think today’s media tends be more cult like than anything else. You either agree with the only right way to think or you are the enemy
Racism is free speech, unless it’s deemed antisemitic, then you’re in trouble!
There is no law that says you can’t been antisemitic. There are a bunch of antisemitic people here on Lemmy.
Armed extremist groups are dumb
Sounds like a bunch of fatass losers who peaked in high school.
The extremists on Lemmy scare me
Removed by mod
This seems like an issue.
A feature, not a bug.
deleted by creator
Isn’t that a good thing? If facebook bans them they may actually learn what opsec means.
Just for my info… any moderate militias out there? Purely informative of course.
