Hamas has condemned the United States’ air strikes on Yemen’s Ras Issa oil port in Al-Hudaydah province, which killed 38 Yemenis and injured dozens, describing the attack as a war crime and a violation of Yemeni sovereignty, Anadolu reported.

Archived version: https://archive.is/newest/https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20250418-hamas-condemns-us-air-strikes-on-yemen-labels-them-as-war-crime/


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

  • stink@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    You are quite literally siding with the nazis in this situation.

    Can you name one example that a hamas rocket killed a child?

    You’d be crying about the warsaw ghetto uprising too, since I’m sure the optics didn’t look too great back then either.

    • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      You’re the one who asked for an example of a war crime, and when I gave one, you shifted the goalposts. Criticizing Hamas doesn’t mean I’m pro-Israel. I can just as easily point to Israeli war crimes like shooting civilians and aid workers. Instead of engaging with the example I gave, you’re dodging the substance and resorting to personal attacks and false binaries.

      • stink@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        You did not provide an example. Name one instance of a hamas rocket killing a child.

        • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          You’re moving the goalposts again.

          This discussion isn’t about killing children - it’s about war crimes, specifically Hamas targeting Israeli civilians with indiscriminate rocket fire. That alone meets the definition under international law, and I’ve already explained why. You haven’t addressed it - you’ve just dodged, reframed, and shifted the subject every time.

          At this point, it’s clear you’re not engaging with what I’m saying. You’re cycling through bad faith tactics - redefining terms, demanding irrelevant proof, personal attacks and pretending I haven’t answered you. If you can’t acknowledge even the most blatant example of a war crime, then you’re not here to discuss - you’re here to deny.