Tbh I find it hard to believe that it’s actually better, knowing how many resources Google probably poured into getting the summaries right already. If the same amount of scrutiny were applied to Kagi’s summaries, people would probably find similarly embarrassing answers.
Perhaps, but it has worked well for me. Plus they have features to change your results to forums, listicles, and other formats, rather than having to add qualifiers to the search. You’d think Google’s general results would be better too, considering all their resources, but they’ve been trash for years now. They’re more focused on making every penny possible than producing good search results.
Except the Kagi one actually works well and doesn’t tell you to drink glue.
Tbh I find it hard to believe that it’s actually better, knowing how many resources Google probably poured into getting the summaries right already. If the same amount of scrutiny were applied to Kagi’s summaries, people would probably find similarly embarrassing answers.
Perhaps, but it has worked well for me. Plus they have features to change your results to forums, listicles, and other formats, rather than having to add qualifiers to the search. You’d think Google’s general results would be better too, considering all their resources, but they’ve been trash for years now. They’re more focused on making every penny possible than producing good search results.