Old textbook from the 50s.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 days ago

    Paramedic here, this is still half of how it’s done for choking in small children and babies. Five back blows, flip, five chest thrusts.

  • Terces@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I…don’t get it. This is an old way to help a child that has something stuck in their throat. I mean, the heimlich maneuver was first described in 1974, so I guess this WAS in fact the best technique at the time. Keeping someone from suffocating is kind of important, and this seems like something you can do fast and easy (at least with a relatively small person).

  • cynar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    That method is still mostly recommended, though mostly for younger children/babies. The Heimlich maneuver is difficult to perform on a small body. You either over squeeze, and cause harm, or are too tentative, and so not helping.

    With babies, you hold them lying on your forearm, facing downwards, and slap (open handed) hard. I’ve only seen it used once, but it worked perfectly then.

      • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Doing that is causing more harm than good. The logic that lead to recommending such action is derived from the institutionalized and abusive corporal discipline of the time. ‘I beat my kid all the time, this can’t possibly be bad for them. They can take it.’

        It’s like a cartoon where someone is being held upside-down by their ankles and shaken. Also, commentary of the time.

        If you honestly believe in 2024 what is pictured is helping, do not help.

    • waigl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      Generally yes, but what’s shown here isn’t, it only looks a bit like it if you ignore the clearly spelled out context.