• frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    We did pursue it. Batteries won for common use cases. There may yet be niches where it’s useful, but they’ll be the exception.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      We’re still pursuing it. Batteries do not work for basically anything other than average passenger vehicles in the city or near cities. They do not work in construction, they do not work for heavy equipment, long haulers or even large sea vessels…they do not work for shit in aircraft that carry anything other than itself or tiny payloads…and they really are pointless for any sort of space propulsion. A mixed energy planet is what is needed, not this “batteries are the end all be all” thought so many of you have.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Most of the items you mention are being overtaken by better batteries. Long haul trucking batteries will likely be at cost parity with diesel trucks this year. Big cargo ships should probably go to SMRs. Airplanes no longer look as out of reach as they once appeared.

        Space flight is such a specialized use case. Of course hydrogen will be the predominant fuel there. More because there’s limited options than anything else.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          None of what you have is being done on a large scale because it doesn’t scale. Batteries are good for basically close cities where range isn’t an issue and super chargers are easily accessible. Everywhere else they do not hold up. You will never see a battery operated crane or some farm equipment, it’s just not possible with our current tech. If batteries magically decrease in weight, cost way less, are rechargeable in 5mins from basically and 110/120 outlet then sure, but for everything that isn’t some nice paved road and a semi short trip, it’s not happening.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Weight is always an issue, who told you it isn’t? And sounds like you know something these engineers don’t.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Some locomotives alone weigh hundreds of tonnes, while weight is an issue, it’s less of an issue than most applications.

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yep, but you’re suggesting that a train which with a diesel motor that weighs that much, wouldn’t be an issue with batteries. If you are going electric, skip the batteries and go over head tram lines and be done with it.