cross-posted from: https://feddit.nl/post/6339559
Here’s some more coverage of the first 2 days of the McBride trial:
- David McBride trial: soldiers shouldn’t be guided by public interest, commonwealth says https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/14/david-mcbride-trial-soldiers-shouldnt-be-guided-by-public-interest-commonwealth-says
- McBride Trial Tests Australian Justice https://consortiumnews.com/2023/11/12/mcbride-trial-tests-australian-justice/
- McBride Trial: A Soldier’s Duty https://consortiumnews.com/2023/11/14/mcbride-trial-a-soldiers-duty/
- Whistleblower McBride in court for exposing war crimes, supported by “War Coalition” https://michaelwest.com.au/whistleblower-mcbride-in-court-for-exposing-war-crimes-supported-by-the-war-coalition/
- Bloody Oath! McBride case – does a officer lawyer’s public duty trump his military duty? https://michaelwest.com.au/bloody-oath-the-mcbride-case-to-hinge-on-who-keeps-their-word-and-to-whom/
This summary misses a key point: