• Eheran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    Would we not expect sudden changes then? This is a steady decline, not indicating any sudden changes in laws or anything.

    • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      Weed legalization hasn’t been sudden though. It’s progressed from medical to decriminalized to legal state by excruciating state.

      As this graph is national, it makes sense that there wouldn’t be a cliff because there’s no particular date when we could say weed became legal.

      Still not legal in any way here in texasss, and I assume we’ll be the very last of the last to do so. But even here, it’s so easily accessible that a good number of younger people I know tell me they prefer weed to alcohol. In legal states, that tendency must be much higher.

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Do we have the same date for individual states? Perhaps some with and some without legal weed?

    • Donkter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Weed has had a steady increase in popularity since like the 70s. I kind of agree, I’m sure there should be some cliff in the states where it was legalized, or if not my theory is bunk. It’s only based on an anecdote tbf.

      Edit: actually if we want any theory it seems pretty clear that the beginning of the drop off started right about at the market crash of 2008.

      Also interesting that female rates stayed steady to the point that they’ve actually overtaken male rates.