• DevCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    There was a discussion a couple of years ago around gasoline taxes and how they are supposed to pay for roadway maintenance. The question came up about EVs. There were discussions about how to include EVs in the taxation system so they would pay for their fair share of the road. One of the options was to impose a tax attached to your vehicle registration based upon the weight of the vehicle. The greater the weight, the more wear and tear it produces on the road surface. This might be one solution to the barrier problem, namely moving the extra cost to the reason for the extra cost.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The “problem” with that tax is that if it’s applied fairly, it gets very big very fast. The damage to the road goes up with weight, but not linearly. Not a square factor, either. Not even cube. It’s to the fourth power.

      Start applying that to long haul trucks and the whole industry will be bankrupt in a month. The implication being that we are all subsidizing that industry with taxes on roads. Including that one trucker with a “who is John Galt?” sticker on the back.

      That said, this is also a very good argument for improving cargo trains to the point where most long haul trucking goes away.

      • magiccupcake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        So much of that freight should be moved by rail.

        Tax based on weight to 4th power would work if we nationalized railways like roads.

        • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Only if rail can figure out their shit and hire enough workers and give them all time off. Too many train derailments from precision scheduled railroading.

          • magiccupcake@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Actually maintained rail shouldn’t have this problem, but the private companies like Norfolk Southern spend the minimum amount to keep them operational.

            With a budget just a fraction of highway upkeep and expansion they should be able to be kept in good repair.

  • TengoHipo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    We just need to not have these big ass trucks for the general public. You don’t need a ford 350 with rims jacked up to show you have money. You are a pavement princess.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      “But I need it for my work!”

      You don’t even have a toolbox on it. If it was an actual work truck, it would be a pickup with the bed replaced with one of those toolbox beds. Or you’d have a sprinter van like the actual plumbers and carpenters around here.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ve never seen one of those, but I believe it! I bet they’re comfy to drive, too.