“People will either agree with that conviction or they won’.”

  • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 days ago

    It should be noted that Adobe can fuck right off, and computerized art is not the only kind of art. It is generous to even call it art. It’s still all called graphics in my opinion.

    I think they’re worried.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    Adobe executives need to embrace being dropped in favor of non-AI programs or be left behind.

  • xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    Without constant influx of fresh art, AI will devolve into deep-fried absurdist memes. :)

  • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’m at an absolute loss as to why people use Adobe. It’s hot garbage and the price is WAY out of league. It’s a shining example of the open market not existing/working as advertised.

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s exactly because of capitalism that everyone is using it. Adobe bought off and killed all alternatives projects. So most people are now dependent on Adobe for their workflows. There are alternatives now, but people are still being dumbasses and are sticking with Adobe instead of taking a small loss to re-learn with alternatives.

        • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          And GhostScript!

          Pandoc and LaTeX as an alternative to InDesign for book and paper publishing. Obviously not a direct replacement since they are macro languages and not GUI tools, but they are free and open source and capable of creating great looking output if you put in the time. There’s tons of free learning resources out there too.