I’d argue it’s an objectively true statement that, of all the people alive today, Putin has singlehandedly caused more death and suffering than anyone else. The gap between him and whoever is second is likely orders of magnitude. Yet, when I read discussions about him, Russia, or the war in Ukraine, I almost never see the kind of hateful, nasty, and mean comments directed at him that I regularly see aimed at Trump, Elon, or even ordinary Republican politicians. Why is that?

Bonus question: Why be so nasty about it in the first place? There’s nothing wrong with criticism, but I struggle to understand the need for such meanness. Even when I agree with the sentiment, reading comments like that feels toxic. It poisons my mind too. I don’t like being angry, and I avoid it for practical reasons as well. Anger clouds my judgment, and I think it does the same for others and thus should be avoided.

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The (so-called) “War On Terror” unleashed by George Bush has caused about 900,000 dead. That is just the death DIRECTLY caused by warfare and not the far, far greater number of people dead through indirect causes such as starvation and disease as a result.

    Or does it only count in your book when the people dying “look like us”?

    • Free_Thoughts@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Or does it only count in your book when the people dying “look like us”?

      No that totally counts. Why do you need to imply I have some racist agenda here?