Why not just have an easy button that you can click saying Do Not Allow Reply All?

I know that there are some ways you can limit reply-all availability, like in the URL linked here. But there’s a note: If recipients open this email in other mail applications except Microsoft Outlook, such as opening on web page via web mailbox, they can reply all this email.

I’m semi-tech savvy but I’m no programmer. It feels like it should be easy to do, so either I’m totally wrong or email services are really missing out on a great thing they could do.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.worldEnglish
    7·
    15 hours ago

    I worked for a startup that got bought by Oracle. Five whole years without a reply-all storm, but the first week we had hundreds of people reply all and it was hilarious watching the admins try and fail to convince people to stop replying all.

    • bitchkat@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      10 hours ago

      The correct response is to reply all when people start bitching. I can usually throw in an “unsubcribe” request in a separate email.

    • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.worldEnglish
      4·
      15 hours ago

      Wonder what the back end software is there. With Exchange reply-all storms are a thing of the past. I don’t have to convince anyone of anything to stop a reply all storm. Takes 2 minutes of setting up a transport rule. But the admin needs to be experienced enough to know that.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.worldEnglish
        5·
        14 hours ago

        It was Oracle so they probably have a terrible internal email server that will have reply-all storm protection in a year or two.

        I was working with the customer service software devs to migrate my team from Salesforce’s Desk.com (because Oracle hates Salesforce) and they said it would take 18 months to make a dropdown that you could type in and select a macro for a ticket. Eventually they gave up.