“The maps shouldn’t have shown that the bridge was complete.”

  • Opisek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 minutes ago

    I fail to see how that’s Google Maps’ fault. This is the city’s fault for not blocking the bridge. Would people have complained if a paper map didn’t update all the collapsed bridges daily?

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Given that there is death involved, this is “sensitive”… So I will not post a gif of Michael and Dwight driving into the river because the GPS told them to.

  • Coreidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 hours ago

    What excuse do they have for ignoring traffic signs and literally every other indication that the road is closed?

    A GPS doesn’t absolve you from personal responsibility. Use your eyes.

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They were driving in the night. Visibility was poor. The road wasn’t closed off. Just to name a few.

      You’re probably imagining reflective signs, barricades, lights, led warning signs, etc. I know i would expect all of those.

      But this is India. And we’re talking about a company that didn’t even block the road. There is a very good chance there were no indications visible in the night.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    137
    ·
    13 hours ago

    what if it was a paper map? would the mapping company be liable?

    put the blame where it belongs; on the construction company who failed to block an unnavigable, dangerous piece of road.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I used to travel by paper map for like all of the 90s and 00s. I can reliably say, it was never the map’s fault.

    • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Yeah I mean it would have been good if google maps could have prevented this but like the same thing could have happened to someone without a map

      • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yeah, I mean, someone has to provide the information. If one day, there’s a full bridge, and the next day it’s deconstructed for repairs, Google can’t magically know; some information needs to be pushed out to be parsed and updated. It wouldn’t surprise me if this was simply done by construction co. without proper filing etc. very few nations have the extreme regulations that U.S. has - it’s one of America’s redeeming qualities. Of course, that may not always be the case. But yknow.

        • Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I suppose it depends on the locale, but I’m my experience, the cities I’ve lived in update the gis maps and send change updates to Google very regularly, where they sit unimplemented for months.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        12 hours ago

        It’s completely irrelevant. It’s not magic.

        Blindly following directions without awareness of the situation around you is always your fault. A failure to block the road is the fault of whoever’s responsible for the road, but never the map.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    12 hours ago
    1. As soon as the bridge was deemed unsafe, it should have had barricades erected.
    2. Situational awareness supersedes maps, digital or not.
    3. Every GPS device, paper map and App out there would have had even chances to miss this.
    4. Driving in India is insane, even if the infrastructure wasn’t as bad as it is… and to be clear, it’s awful.
    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Infrastructure and Driving in India come with substantial risks to life.

    • IvanOverdrive@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Nope. Public safety just isn’t a thing in India. At least it wasn’t twenty years ago when I went there. People die, everyone goes about their day, and nothing changes.

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Man, I went to like 3 different Targets to find an item because the company that made the item said those Targets carried it. None of them did.

      Of course, nothing is better than a store saying they carry an item when they in fact do not. That happens pretty frequently when I’m looking for something specific. Not out of stock mind you, but they will never have stock.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Those people are fun the first and second time. After that you start getting a certain attitude towards them.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        After working retail for more than a decade… Those people deserve it. The type of person to argue with an employee about whether they carry something or not solely because Google said so, are the quintessential Karen. They deserve every bit of unhelpfulness right back at them for the misery they sow everywhere they go.