• melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The correct answer to #2 is

    ‘Make it easier to tap the lines safely and steal gas without putting anyone at risk, then die in the revolution.’

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes. Services like gas and water are natural monopolies - it doesn’t make sense to roll out two or three separate lots of distribution pipes, so you always just have one service available to you. The best option is to have them as government owned services.

      • SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes. Services like gas and water are natural monopolies

        Pipes may lean towards being a monopoly, delivering goods through them only if the owners are allowed to block using them freely.

    • jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Um… I’m perfectly OK with a “monopoly” for my fire fighting services. Why would I feel differently for my utilities services?

      • SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think it’s cute that people in a so-called solar"punk" community are against freedom. No freedom to start a business, no freedom to choose service providers. Did hexbear migrate to solarpunk?

        • Sewer_King@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Nothing says punk more than enabling for profit corporations to hold sole ownership of the utilities that we need to continue living in a bare minimum standard of living. /s

        • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s not the people in the solarpunk community (because of federation posts get federated throughout the fediverse) but rather people not noticing the community

        • tomatol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          We’re talking about basic utilities though. Do you think the average person can start or run such a business? I’m honestly interested in the answer.

            • tomatol@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Good point but I would say it’s hard to monopolize solar power since it’s easy to just buy your own panels. Wheras it’s not feasible to buld your own power plant.

              • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Wasn’t that the point though? You’re arguing that small scale power doesn’t exist when it clearly does.

                • tomatol@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  I never said that. Small scale power is always the way to go! Be it small hydro or solar panels!

                  It’s very different to have small localized power and distribution networks than controlling a whole country’s power and then giving that whole network to a private company to manage.

        • jaschen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Please enlighten me on how I can start a utilities company? Make sure you give me details on how I can maximize profits to my shareholders while fucking over my customers.

          Or maybe I should start a non-profit utilities company, and the cost of your services is subsidized by taxpayers’ money. That way, I don’t have to constantly chase capitalism and make life better for my community instead of my shareholders.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Those things are natural monopolies, so the choice isn’t monopoly vs free-market it’s profit-driven-monopoly vs public-good-driven-monopoly.

      Unlike what’s said by the mindless pseudo-Economics bollocks a lot of prople have been indoctrinated with, the upsides for consumers of a Free Market only exist in the subset of markets were there are natural conditions for high levels of competition - which is most definitelly not gas provision to households - and even in those there are still systemic problems such as negative externalities that require some level of regulation.