• nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    If we think of intelligence as goal-directed and adaptive behavior, then natural selection will select for competitive traits, and so whatever ended up losing was less intelligent in some sense, even if it’s a single-cell organism.

    • the_fuzz@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Actually, there’s a lot of evidence that points to intelligence being a sexually selected trait rather than naturally selected, so in that sense it may actually negatively correlate with survival. In other words, your big brain is the human equivalent of peacock features; it will get you laid but doesn’t do much good when a tiger comes around.

      Think of it this way: to sit around doing math problems all day, you have to have the basic necessities for survival dealt with, which shows you’re a good mate within the current environment. Which is all well and good until times change, the going gets tough, and you need to kill something to put food on the table.

      • nifty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        it will get you laid but doesn’t do much good when a tiger comes around.

        This is categorically false, sorry