• stochastictrebuchet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    17 days ago

    Hm… I’m all for open standards, but Apple should retain the right to develop features that work exclusively on their devices (provided their devices support alternative protocols to avoid total lock-in). As open-source and linux loving as I am, I’m a willing prisoner of the Apple closed garden because I appreciate how refined and integrated everything is. (Others’ experience may differ)

    • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 days ago

      iPhone does notsupport file sharing over Bluetooth, so it invalidates the condition you put between ().

    • oktoberpaard@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 days ago

      The way I read it, they’re not asked to follow an open standard, but to provide a specification for their own standard. That means that they could dictate the pace of development and others could decide for themselves wether or not to implement it for their devices. It’s similar to WhatsApp being forced to provide third parties with API access.

      Also, they currently don’t support alternative protocols with cross-platform support and they’re not going to, unless forced.

    • athairmor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 days ago

      Yeah, I don’t get. Let Apple have their walled garden and people can choose to be in or out. They don’t have a monopoly in any hardware or software market, do they?

      If so many people choose their walled garden to make them a monopoly then start forcing them open.