• catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    I mean, I can count how many times I’ve thought “damn I wish I still had wired headphones” on zero hands.

    • OnfireNFS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 days ago

      I’ve never really understood the argument against headphone jacks. I can still use Bluetooth headphones with my phone. I can also use wired headphones and aux cables on my phone. Why would you want less features

      • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        23 days ago

        I’d be fine if they gave us another USB C port, but inability to listen and charge the phone at the same time without using Bluetooth (which also needs to be charged) grinds my gears.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        I’m not arguing against it, just not particularly arguing for it. Out of all the removed features, I’d want the IR blaster back. I can’t do that with Bluetooth.

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 days ago

      I dunno, how about the horrible privacy practices of most cars nowadays? Bluetooth allows connection, sure. It also allows data to go between the device and the car. An aux jack can’t do that.

      • Anivia@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        FYI “to each their own” was a phrase used on the entrance of a nazi concentration camp, same as “work sets you free”. Might wanna avoid that phrase in the future

        • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          23 days ago

          Makes no sense. Using a commonly used phrase has nothing to do with Nazis in almost any context despite the origin. No need to start making a list of things to change because of an old connection to something bad.

    • theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Must be nice to either accept the objectively worse sound quality of wireless headphones, or be wealthy enough to afford a product that sounds almost as good as the wired version does for ten times the price and just not care about it getting stolen.

      • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 days ago

        I care a moderate amount about audio quality, but my bigger gripes with Bluetooth generally involve the latency and inconvenience of switching devices (even with multipoint).

      • bjorney@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        be wealthy enough to afford a product that sounds almost as good as the wired version does for ten times the price

        Or maybe just go buy a $5 adapter so you can use your wired headphones

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        If I cared that much about audio quality, I wouldn’t be listening to music on my phone anyway.

        I’m not sure which product you’re referring to that’s ten times the price. You can get quality monitors for around $200. I don’t know of any Bluetooth headphones that are going to match that quality at any price, but you can get close enough for the majority of purposes in the same price range. The biggest issue will be the Bluetooth audio codec and the wireless link itself (signal strength and latency), not the sound reproduction quality.