irreticent@lemmy.worldM to This is not my Life@lemm.eeEnglish · 2 months agoMeritocracy of Serving Capitallemmy.worldimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1183file-textcross-posted to: usauthoritarianism@lemmy.world
arrow-up1183imageMeritocracy of Serving Capitallemmy.worldirreticent@lemmy.worldM to This is not my Life@lemm.eeEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square9fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: usauthoritarianism@lemmy.world
minus-squareiii@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoWhat a weird take. Science has always been the persuit of few. Even before climate change was noticed.
minus-squaremojofrododojo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agohttps://www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2024/may/08/hopeless-and-broken-why-the-worlds-top-climate-scientists-are-in-despair https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/oct/25/we-have-emotions-too-climate-scientists-respond-to-attacks-on-objectivity they’ve been predicting, warning, screaming about it for 20-30-40 years and the toll on their mental health from the lack of action is significant. https://grist.org/science/lost-history-climate-1960s-clean-air-act-supreme-court/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/06/11/30-years-ago-scientists-warned-congress-on-global-warming-what-they-said-sounds-eerily-familiar/ the scientists have been trying to get people to listen.
minus-squareiii@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 months agoThe gathered evidence indicates that predicting, warning, screaming does not work. It’s foolish to persue a known failing strategy.
minus-squaremojofrododojo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agothanks for this insightful knowledge. pfffft. didja figure all that out yourself sherlock or did doc watson help you?
minus-squareiii@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 months agoSince it seems like many people never figure it out, as they keep hitting their toes on the same stone, to the point it affects their mental health, I thought it usefull to make it explicit.
minus-squaremojofrododojo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months ago Since it seems like many people never figure it out, or they just might think your premise is specious. You’re entitled to your opinions.
What a weird take. Science has always been the persuit of few. Even before climate change was noticed.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2024/may/08/hopeless-and-broken-why-the-worlds-top-climate-scientists-are-in-despair
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/oct/25/we-have-emotions-too-climate-scientists-respond-to-attacks-on-objectivity
they’ve been predicting, warning, screaming about it for 20-30-40 years and the toll on their mental health from the lack of action is significant.
https://grist.org/science/lost-history-climate-1960s-clean-air-act-supreme-court/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/06/11/30-years-ago-scientists-warned-congress-on-global-warming-what-they-said-sounds-eerily-familiar/
the scientists have been trying to get people to listen.
The gathered evidence indicates that predicting, warning, screaming does not work. It’s foolish to persue a known failing strategy.
thanks for this insightful knowledge.
pfffft. didja figure all that out yourself sherlock or did doc watson help you?
Since it seems like many people never figure it out, as they keep hitting their toes on the same stone, to the point it affects their mental health, I thought it usefull to make it explicit.
or they just might think your premise is specious. You’re entitled to your opinions.