You mean “typo”?

Re-read your previous comment. You specifically said:

Republicans are not against illegal immigration

Wait, you’re telling me Republicans haven’t been against illegal immigration this whole time??

I mean I know that he’s dishonest and doesn’t give a shit about immigrant workers but I’m sharing it here for discussion amongst the conservative community because this goes against rhetoric I typically hear from Conservatives about immigration. I’m curious to know how they process this.

lol once again, a conservative source taking a quote out of context.

The full quote was that they wouldn’t hire white men for specific roles.

Which makes sense, not every role is going to a fit for a white man.

Goddamn y’all are so sensitive and reactionary sometimes.

NUH UH WERE A REPUBLIC

• Someone somewhere in this thread, probably

This isn’t an issue of ideological debates, it’s literally just not understanding the difference in terms properly.

The United States has a form of government best described as a Representative Democracy. It is structured as a Republic, with Representatives elected through Democratic processes.

Trying to dismiss improper usage of the terms is not what an “emotional meltdown” is. That would actually be closer to what the OP is doing, trying to assert the incorrect usage of the terms in an attempt to be correct.

I get you’re not actually interested in discussing this shit but please don’t align yourself with the confidently incorrect ones.

Not even, that’s just what it seems like to me.

Right but that’s not the “kill switch”. The kill switch would be what detects BAC and responds by preventing or limiting motor vehicle operation.

In other words, the tech added to cars won’t be the kill switch itself, it’ll enable the installation of one.

Do you need me to grab the entire section?

No thanks. Let me know if you need anything else cleared up.

Yeah I think I hit a nerve.

A couple details this article fails to consider:

• The law does not directly require a “kill switch”. Just the tech to add and talk to devices that monitor blood alcohol content. Calling it that is just fearmongering, and this capability has been modified into cars for literal decades now. This law simply requires a standard be built around the installation of a device.
• The law gives no access or control capabilities to law enforcement or government officials
• There is to date still no mechanism for this device to measure blood alcohol content, which would have to be standardized by EOY for this to make the 2026 date where the earliest vehicles with this requirement can enter the market, because automakers need at least 2-3 years to implement the tech.
• 18 Republicans voted for this, which was required to pass this bill in the first place. If you have a beef, I suggest taking it up with them.

This is a shitty law, but it’s not as doom and gloomy as the source makes it out to be.

Do it! Your health is important! ❤️

Non-partisan take: You shouldn’t be penalized for needing medical care, no matter who you are.

deleted by creator

Yeah they’re usually pretty tense

No hahah.

Who’s doing that?

Oh I’m not mad at all hahaa. Do I give that impression?

I can be intense but my bp is within normal limits don’t you worry :)

It’s like a child selectively hearing when you ask them to do a chore vs do something fun, except this is our political system and that affects lives.

Yeah, and you have Obama to thank for that.

You also said: “He will lose them at some point. Obama changed The direction of how long people keep their secret service details.”

You’re wrong about him losing them, thanks to Obama.