• 1 Post
  • 15 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 8th, 2023

help-circle


  • Software subscription and DRM on resin/filament are huge red flags. Had a look at heygears offerings as people describe it as the BambuLab equivalent for SLA. Looking into it, the feels more like a FormLabs company with overpriced resins and DRM to make you buy their resin.

    Spending once 1.5-2k€ for the Flex RS printer is fine (more than I would like) but paying 40-70€/kg for resin killed it. Just not possible to economically justify paying twice as much for the source materials (resin). This would mean HeyGear jacking up the production cost by approx. 50-80%, indefinitely. A better option is it spend a day dialing in a third-party resin on the Prusa or Elegoo.

    subscription = selling the same software indefinitely

    paid upgrades = forced to deliver value/improvements with each paid update

    for materials it is similar:

    DRM = jacking up prices

    open = competing on quality: You could use our first-party product with perfect integration but you are free to source whatever you like


  • Well, any printer will do that if you calibrate it well enough.

    Pain point in the past where the build platform. Prints frequently failed because they would lift from the aluminum plate.

    After a lot of trouble, I switched to a flexible buildplate which first was blasted with course “sand” followed by fine glass beans. flexplate so I can remove the print. The course surface makes the print stick but not stick too well. Would like this time to avoid all of this troubleshooting.

    Also considered buying one of those printers that work upside down by projecting the light onto the surface and the print is lowered into the resin vat.

    “Good” is fairly ambiguous here because what would a “good” slicer look like to you?

    Good workflow (UI design), decent automatic support generation, good tool for manually brushing/configuring support material and ideally an elephant foot compensation setting/calibration for the first layer which has a significantly longer exposure time.

    Support generation and being able to manually edit those pushed me toward PrusaSlicer.

    The VAT tilt is a bit dangerous because of a potential resin leak of the release film, leaking into your printer’s internals

    How big of an issue is that? Are there upgrades to seal the printer?

    Back in the day, it was more or less a total economic loss for those cheap printers: LCD damaged, UV-array damaged and a complete mess within that was hard to clean.


  • I care about proprietary in the sense that I am locked to a certain slicer. Don’t care if the mechanical design and firmware is proprietary.

    Also I don’t care that much about replacement parts. Affordable FEP-film (or those never versions of release film) is important. Other replacement parts are nice to have but never had to repair anything (the highest risk I see is flooding it with resin or dropping something in the vat that will crush the screen and if you are careful this is highly unlikely to ever happen especially now with the pressure detection on some printer models).


  • Great to hear you like it and that UV-tools work with it. What I hated about anycubic photon workshop was that the support generation was 100% manual (automatically created unusable results). PrusaSlicer was so much easier to work with.

    The nice aspect of network connectivity is comfortably moving files to it and receiving a notification once the print is done.

    I keep misplacing USB-sticks or it is a pain to first walk to the printer, picking up the stick, returing to the PC, and walking once more to the printer.









  • I love DIY.

    At home, I run and build DIY printers but you can’t deploy them in a business/production. Why? As soon as there is a printer that isn’t it just works with easy (and documented) maintance procedures the business needs to hire not only a worker but a worker who knows 3D printers. That’s bad.

    Printers like the Sovol SV08 and Biqu AMS (still not launched) aren’t just there yet.

    Combined with the BambuLab pricing on the A1 mini and P1S it is pretty difficult to buy FOSS.

    Prusa is close with the Core 1 but they don’t have an good AMS package for their printers (their MMU lacks a enclosure/easy to deploy setup). They propably know it but don’t have the answer avaible.

    Equally on the econmics side it is difficult: The BambuLab P1S killed the (FOSS) market.

    If I compare a 1150€ BambuLab X1C against the 1350€ Prusa Core One I would likley prefer the Prusa product/ecosystem. With the P1S it suddently is 700€ compared to 1350€ for a machine that will produce the exact same parts with a near identical cycletime, uptime and opperating/maintance cost. The decission in favor of BambuLab is easy.