There is no ‘maybe’ there. LLMs have no metric or ability to tell if something is ‘true’ or not. Any ‘finangling’ you’d have to do is so much of the work that the LLM is doing the same thing it always does - “That’s a great point!”

You’d have better luck asking the paint bucket in MS Paint what a rainbow looks like.

Who are some struggling artists I can follow to help balance that out?

Holy fuck - I finally found someone else talking about them. I can ONLY have these when I have sex with other people - the typical orgasm just doesn’t happen. (Also vice versa, never had one alone) I’ve always called them my internal orgasms and have to have a fucking brief with whoever I’m about to sleep with to give them basically this run-down.

Christ. Part of me feels so awful for her because of the way she’s learned how to talk about herself - it’s ALL facade. You can tell when she has to look away when she points out her ‘interesting attempt at color painting’. No kid says that about their own artwork unless their parent said it first.

I wonder if any of the kids will change their opinions after he dies.

Friendly reminder that the Boston Tea Party was about tariffs. We know what works.

Worst part? The original is super easy to find, and also didn’t need up-scaling at all.

Yeah, and the Wizard of Oz said “Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain”. It’s the only way their lies still work on you.

The chosen representative of the most powerful being that has ever or will ever exist…

…and yet he still needs a bullet-proof car. Interesting.

If it makes you feel any better- it’s also mostly bots.

Looks closer

Skerple

Yep.

XcQ - Link stays blue

Truly - What do they care about what happens after they’re dead? … They’ll be dead.

They have no empathy towards anyone who will suffer the consequences because they won’t have to be the ones to deal with the fallout. “Fuck you, I got mine” is their entire strategy.

That’s when you make the kid help bake the cookies, but give ALL of them away.

A “40% chance of rain” does not mean that there is a 40% chance that it will rain in general. It could mean anything from “there’s a 50% chance that 80% of the area will receive rainfall” to “there’s a 100% chance that only 40% of the area will receive rainfall”.

It’s dumb, but it makes a weird sort of sense when you realize you have to talk about entire area codes about something that can be hyper-localized or extremely broad. Don’t expect it to be too personalized.

No, I read that - it’s just not substantial. If the ding already existed, my point is that the driver is overlooking it in the photo we’re seeing. That is proof that it is not new damage and shouldn’t be considered in this case. I get that you’re trying to CYA, but it doesn’t need to be to this degree of hyper-vigilance.

verifiable evidence that the damage was pre-existing that the note leaver could somehow provide

Like a photo of the driver circling the car, unable to spot where the damage was, immediately after reading the note? Hmmmm…

Don’t make me go to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy with Majorly Terrible Goblin.

It’s not even calibrated for stereoscopic viewing - this is just an overlay on a screenshot! The VR experience would be terrible!

I don’t think coffee rice (rice coffee?) sounds all that great, but I should give it a try…

“Remember: you’re reversed - your car isn’t.”

Literally the next scene

Car window frosts over because it gets set on fire

I stopped trying to make sense of the internal logic at that point. The fight scenes were interesting, but at the cost of immersion in the story. Not to mention - the acting/dialogue is entirely bland plot points spoken at the audience as much as the other characters.