Thanks for the great detailed explanation. So ignoring the original silly question. How do smaller commercial planes manage the shifting of fuel and such. I’ve been on some prop planes that had a bathroom, and in some cases removed passengers because we were overweight.
It doesn’t have to match the power. It just has to F up the storms rotation enough that it disrupts itself. I don’t know if it could be enough, but it certainly doesn’t need to equal the power of the storm.
Only if they come with a parent who changes their diaper, and go home at night.
It is interesting to me that they do honestly. Liquids shift weight a lot, which can be very dangerous to planes. I wonder how they handle it. Maybe they only put it on planes so big that the weight shift is negligable?
I get wanting a clean car and all, but my buddy gets his washed like 2 or 3 times a week. I get mine washed like 2 or 3 times a year. They are both honda pilots.
Kinda yeah. If they can’t extract the amount of cash from you they want, they don’t want you clogging up the line causing people to eventually cancel.
What they really want to do is eliminate an employee entirely. Sign up online, show up, scana qr code with thier app. One person to guide you in, done.
Not sure I could convince my self to read on the subject. But maybe a video? I don’t normally do videos for much of anything, but this might be the right subject for that format.
The shockwave might mess with the rotation. Or it would still be to little to make a difference. I’m no expert.
I’ve actually been thinking about this the last few months. Everytime I think of something I wish a game would do that it doesn’t, I realize it would be boring if it did. I don’t like tedium, but without it, a lot of games would just play themselves with you watching. So what even makes a game fun to play?
It’s a very interesting idea actually. And it could be made to work. Think of like a civ game, but it’s on auto pilot. All you can do is kill off people. Never specific people, but you can shift percentages around and increase the odds of different groups of people dieing. The game just simulates what happens. The end is when one ai takes over the world by the usualy possible paths. The intersting part will be, what kind of AI will win.
Trump would probably try to nuke it if he thought his place was under threat.
That person signed onto a rare and exclusive contract to produce a specific food item. The contract was designed specifically to create rarity for that item so they could control the price and artificially raise it. He was fine with destroying food up until he felt like he didn’t get paid enough. His giving away the food was an act of spite, not generosity. He only did it to get back at the company he signed the contract with. This is not a good person.
This is just a story of two greedy profit chasing parties fighting with each other. Fuck em both.
Businesses are not people. Don’t expect them to act like “good” people. Regulation and unions are the only things that shape the morality of a busniess.
IT? Clue? … I didn’t even know he was in those, but I certainly know who he was. Maybe it should just be best know for being an excellent all around actor. That should be okay.
So I do find this kind of interesting. The feds can’t tell a state how to run their election. But usps is a federal entity. So I don’t see why trump can’t tell them not to handle ballots. I don’t like it, but I am not really sure there is sound legal recourse.
The amount of loss here is magnitudes larger. And the difference is that companies like twitter and amazon ran at a loss while they poured money into infrastructure that they get to keep, and use. AI companies are spending most of the money on consumables. Depending on which, they will have some server assets and such. But when the bubble bursts, those wll be worth a lot less as everyone will be trying to offload them. Also, twitter wasn’t riding a bubble.
As few as… likely meant anywhere from 70 to 7000. The ranges on such predictions are usually very wide. Also, sure, 70 people could get lucky and not get wiped out. But the odds are strongly against them.
Um… 400 years is rather low. Even for optimal. But realistic is more like 1000’s.
Hitlers idea was to keep killing the people with the wrong genetics for as long as it took. Hand him nukes and he could clear people a lot faster at the cost of getting some of those he wanted to keep. I bet he would have been willing to trade.
Mars… no idea what you are talking about. No one has ever suggested mars could outbreed earth.
Muslims… the fearmongering I hear is that they will pollute the culture by bringing their own. Don’t need to outbreed for that. And mixing of cultures is a good thing, not a bad one. That is the real reason those people are wrong.
Thanks for the education. Learning makes life interesting.