• 4 Posts
  • 70 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 11th, 2023

help-circle













  • Ech@lemm.eetoYUROP@lemm.eea cool guide of foods
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    While I didn’t know specific dates, I’m not surprised by the ones I know by name here, tbh. Flavorful food was a luxury for most until relatively recently, and along with the large cultural changes going on last century, these all make sense.


  • Ech@lemm.eetoScience Memes@mander.xyzEvery base is base 10
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I think that would confuse things more than it would help. It’s base 5, unless it’s base 10, unless it’s base 50, etc. And then there’s the rules designating numbers 1 below certain other numbers, or 2 below, depending on the system being used. That’s a whole web of complications when communication is already murky.

    One glyph to one integer communicates the number system being used more clearly.


  • Ech@lemm.eetoScience Memes@mander.xyzEvery base is base 10
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It’s only 15 to us because we use base 10 (or 9+1). Like how we have 4 through 9, but that aliens in the picture only count up to 3.

    In the case of a mismatch, the culture using the higher base would just translate down (Base 21+1 in the given scenario).

    Single units would probably be the simplest method, but also wildly impractical as the base gets higher. You really want to count each digit just to figure out someone uses Base 100?


  • Ech@lemm.eetoScience Memes@mander.xyzEvery base is base 10
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Huh, that’s a good point. A better universal naming system would be something like “Base x+1”, with x being one integer lower than 10. So humans would use Base 9+1, and the alien would use Base 3+1.

    *This has been on my mind all day and the more I think about it, the more obvious it becomes how fundamentally terrible the name “Base-10” is. How did this never occur to the people who coined the term? Even the system I suggested is flawed as it’s still trying to incorporate the same bad logic.

    A better system would be something like Base 9, stopping shy of the respective 10 in each system, or if it needs to be clarified, Base 9+0, as 0 is the extra digit in the first place, not 10.