• 9 Posts
  • 166 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 24th, 2024

help-circle

  • There’s also some element that “alternative sites” tend to accumulate the people banned from the primary site. Luckily the strong left-leaning initial crowd kept most of the bigotry at bay during the formative years, but I really dislike that in general-purpose instances, many have failed to create much original culture distinct from reddit. Lemmy isn’t reddit, and that can be a good thing.







  • In this context, where the Australia is literally a imperial colony of the largest empire in the history of the world

    It’s a mixed situation after Federation. Historically, Australia (the state) was founded as a British colony, and we legally are still part of the Commonwealth under their king, and also the US has significant influence over Australia, but we’ve seen Australia has demonstrated its own capacity for imperialism in the region.

    This doesn’t negate your point at all, it’s just something which is often forgotten.









  • It’s complicated.

    Unfortunately, the Wikipedia articles I found lack citations, so they probably aren’t a good source. They claim that the ROC (Taiwan) claims all of the mainland.

    This reddit thread refers to the ROC constitution and interprets it as:

    In the Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan area and the Mainland area, the following is stated:

    “Taiwan Area” refers to Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, Matsu, and any other area under the effective control of the Government.

    “Mainland Area” refers to the territory of the Republic of China outside the Taiwan Area.

    “People of the Taiwan Area” refers to the people who have household registrations in the Taiwan Area.

    “People of the Mainland Area” refers to the people who have household registrations in the Mainland Area.

    The implication is that wherever this law applies, is what the ROC government considers to be “territory of the ROC outside of the Taiwan Area”. Currently the application of this law overlaps the entirety of the PRC, minus HK and Macau.


    This the fun part. If you look at the ROC constitution, it makes […] mention to Mongolia and Tibet.

    I don’t know how much of this applies beyond the KMT.


  • I think rules, written or otherwise, should have exceptions to account for extreme circumstances like this, but a lot of online people just go ‘No, if you don’t bring your cart back you’re a BAD PERSON no matter what!’.

    To treat any rule as immutable is an idealist junk perspective. Rules, like all ideas, need to be applied to a context, and I personally don’t see the point in codifying every possible exception. Law officials, programmers and others can tell you how Sisyphean that task would be.

    So yes, there are exceptions (obviously!). If you’re putting your cart back and you injure your leg, you don’t have to crawl on your arms just to put it back. But we can still generally say “people should put their cart back after shopping” and it’s clear that we’re generalizing.





  • eureka@aussie.zonetoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldDon't be fooled
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Sociopaths always win.

    That’s not exactly my point, it’s more that our current political economy penalises pro-social behaviour (a business is more likely to be out-competed and fail if they actually treat their workers and customers well, so it’s an exceptional thing to see) and sociopaths are rewarded for profiting in this system, their gain comes at our exploitation so they’re effectively rewarded for hurting us.

    If we can restructure our political economy so that sociopaths are rewarded by contributing to society, then their own competitiveness and greed is much less of a problem. For lack of another better developed-world example, look at how China keeps their billionaires on a leash[1]. Now obviously there’s plenty of problems in their political system and some would say they their billionaires are still a problem despite them being dominated by the government, but it’s an example of an alternative to the oligarchical system we know, proof that there are successful ways forwards which are applicable to our economies, even if we don’t copy them exactly (that would be silly).

    (On top of this, a society is certainly capable of detecting and ostracising or punishing anti-social people such as sociopaths. The problem is that the most important ones are effectively out of reach in our society since they have a police force protecting them and we have a more alienated, disorganised society)


    1. https://redsails.org/china-has-billionaires/#fnref14 ↩︎