True nathematician would never make a mistake distinguishing finite and infinite cardinality. Countability, on the other hand… (but that’s a separate issue)

Easy, view it on a curved display. Now every line is curved

I see. Maybe learning mathematics have screwed my writing since so much of mathematical literature is simply equations, definitions and propositions. Lots of papers, and even books, are just bad at expositions, in my experience.

I wish I were you, I struggle so much with reading books and papers

They do have antiderivatives, you just cannot elementarily compute them. Non-exact differential forms, however…

Seems like one can maybe work with complex metric. Interesting idea

I am sorry, but… to be pedantic, pythagorean theorem works on real-valued length. Complex numbers can be scalars, but one does not use it for length for some reason I forgor.

Thanks a lot, will try!!

How well does it work? On my iPad, Safari Adguard can only black out ad content. (Screen is black during ad, and it displays how many seconds of ad is left)

deleted by creator

Topology on steroids with K-valued logic, nice

I am not familiar with this, would you share what country you are talking about?

May I ask for an interesting archeological piece/story?

This one comment of 4 words triggers me so hard that it momentarily stumped me

As a TA who barely did a class, so relatable

Infinitesimal approach is often more convoluted when you perform various operations, like exponentials.

Instead, epsilon-delta can be encapsulated as a ball business, then later to inverse image check for topology.

Thanks, I dunno how but this let me see the joke

That sounds likely for my high school days, but not for middle school ones. That said, people were likely less mature in middle school. I feel like I am very bad at masking, I wonder if it is in effect at all.

Asking to people a bit far away will be even more weird behavior. Currently, most people do not sit near me.

I am too scared to do this in classroom…