• 0 Posts
  • 56 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 5th, 2023

help-circle
  • I don’t support Harris, but I will vote for her because Trump winning will only make things worse. And accelerate the climate catastrophe, which will hurt everyone who lives here, animals and plants too.

    As far as how I will get the US to stop funding Israel… I won’t. It’s a bigger problem then myself.

    But, organizing outside of the election cycle is the way to do it. Protests, strikes, not paying our taxes. Those are the ways to change things.

    A third party protest vote won’t change anything. It will just get your candidate and those who voted for them blamed for spoiling a two party election and putting Trump in office.

    P.S. The framing of your question sucks btw. For reasons I pointed out above (I don’t support Harris, and I don’t propose that I can do anything personally to stop the genocide outside of organizing with others. And, if Trump is elected, the genocide will accelerate and likely spread to other middle eastern countries, and everyone will be suffering greatly by 2075 due to climate change).






  • I don’t have any issues with the drugs themselves. That said, there’s serious consent issues around these medications, at least in the U.S.

    Such as being overprescribed for conditions that they don’t treat well (CPTSD and PTSD for instance), having the positive effects overstated (they’re okay for mild to moderate depression, and not great for off label uses such as those just mentioned), and having the side effects downplayed (addictive is addictive, we don’t need new words like discontinuation syndrome, when withdrawal communicates clearly). SSRIs aren’t even the worst offenders on the market when it comes to this. SNRIs often have a very short half life, and a single missed dose can cause crippling withdrawal.

    But how many of us have been prescribed these off label? With no indication of their addictive nature and potential withdrawal, not to mention sexual dysfunction? And for conditions that they don’t treat well to begin with? That’s not informed consent.








  • I think whoever framed the presumption of innocence and proof beyond a reasonable doubt felt that way.

    Jurors themselves are complicated. Some people are racist, some people are just hateful, some people respect authority so much that they’ll just believe whatever the district attorney says. All of these conditions can create a situation where the jury won’t reach consensus easily .

    And pretty much everybody just wants to get back to brunch and taking care of their families.

    I think what you are speaking to is values. What I’m talking about is emotions as they are felt in the moment and how those will affect a jury’s outcome.

    Hence people are not computers.