• Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think it’s a little racist to remove agency from people who’ve made moves equally validly explained as self-defence and preservation against a hostile invader.

      • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Does seem to be the case, they also seem to have no follow up to researched rebuttals of their talking points.

        Edit: although the person I was responding to does seem to be not, if not anti, Marxist-Lenninist. Maybe they’re Dengian or Maoist…

    • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      The invader was only hostile to the wealthy landowners who quite literally enslaved the people in literally feudal Tibet. Imagine if China had given international recognition to Marie Antoinette during the French Revolution, and people were treating her as a sort of government in exile. This is literally what the US is doing with the fucking Dalai Lama