“This is major prejudice,” Aidala argued in February. “It’s saying, ‘He’s a bad guy. He’s a bad guy. He’s a bad guy.’”
Your client is a bad guy.
This ruling is ridiculous. The purpose of other women testifying was to establish a pattern of behavior. Not in the broad sense, but in the narrow sense of following the same play book each time he attacked a victim.
Your client is a bad guy.
This ruling is ridiculous. The purpose of other women testifying was to establish a pattern of behavior. Not in the broad sense, but in the narrow sense of following the same play book each time he attacked a victim.
He is a bad guy but the law is the law. We need it to be applied fairly.
It just means there will be a new trial and then he’ll be back in prison.