Mambabasa@slrpnk.netM to Antiwork@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 months agoWe want the zero hour work week!slrpnk.netimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1203
arrow-up1203imageWe want the zero hour work week!slrpnk.netMambabasa@slrpnk.netM to Antiwork@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squarenull@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoYou asked what was said, not what what was implied. If everyone is entitled to a 0 hour work week, that means they are entitled to do 0 hours of work.
minus-square9tr6gyp3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 months agoYes. There are zero places in the original post where it says “nobody needs to work” It says “We want the zero hour work week!”.
minus-squarenull@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months ago If everyone is entitled to a 0 hour work week, that means they are entitled to do 0 hours of work.
minus-square9tr6gyp3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoThats a totally different thing than “nobody needs to work”.
minus-squarenull@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoNo it isn’t. If everyone is entitled to work 0 hours, then nobody is required to work. They are equivalent.
minus-squarenull@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoYou are welcome to disagree with the standard definitions of words, yes. Its not generally advised, but you do you.
You asked what was said, not what what was implied.
If everyone is entitled to a 0 hour work week, that means they are entitled to do 0 hours of work.
Yes. There are zero places in the original post where it says “nobody needs to work” It says “We want the zero hour work week!”.
Thats a totally different thing than “nobody needs to work”.
No it isn’t.
If everyone is entitled to work 0 hours, then nobody is required to work. They are equivalent.
Agree to disagree then.
You are welcome to disagree with the standard definitions of words, yes.
Its not generally advised, but you do you.