• Turun@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      2 months ago

      Forsén stated in the 2019 documentary film Losing Lena, "I retired from modeling a long time ago. It’s time I retired from tech, too… Let’s commit to losing me.

      From Wikipedia

      She was a paid model, so I don’t consider the usage unethical based on that. But I like this comment from a journal:

      In today’s age of high-resolution digital image technology, it seems difficult to argue that a 512 × 512 image produced with a 1970s-era analog scanner is the best we have to offer as an image quality test standard".

      Lmao, they do have a point though!

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        In today’s age of high-resolution digital image technology, it seems difficult to argue that a 512 × 512 image produced with a 1970s-era analog scanner is the best we have to offer as an image quality test standard".

        I mean, this puts into context that the standard probably should have been some kind of test card like this :

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philips_circle_pattern

        alt text?

        • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          See below. We don’t disagree. It’s a good move, the hype is the problem. It feels wrong. It should have been removed as it was the right thing to do. I’ve seen a lot of stuff about this recently from people who feel the need to chirp about a woman that wanted privacy.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Naw, they’re excellent for determining which kind of people are controlling manipulative monsters!