• Khanzarate@lemmy.worldEnglish
    10·
    1 year ago

    Nah.

    That one was dinosaurs changed gender to male, citing the frog DNA they completed the chain with as having that potential.

    So what was supposed to be an all-female park to prevent reproduction became co-ed and then nature happened.

    • Caboose12000@lemmy.worldEnglish
      5·
      1 year ago

      I’m still confused on the difference

      Edit: thank you to everyone who replied, I understand the difference now

      • lakemalcom10@lemm.eeEnglish
        12·
        1 year ago

        Parthenogenesis - egg just becomes embryo, no male required

        Jurassic Park - one individual turned from female to male and started making babies

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.worldEnglish
        12·
        1 year ago

        Jurassic Park’s version is still sexual reproduction. Parthenogenesis is a form of asexual reproduction.

      • homesnatch@lemm.eeEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        One was direct development of an egg into an embryo, the other was conversion of an animal from one sex to another to facilitate mating.