• Ignotum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Usurp? They won’t be the ones to develop quantum computers, nor will they be developing fusion, if those technologies become available they might start using them but that won’t somehow mean it won’t be available for other uses.

    And seeing as they make money from “renting out” the models, they can easily be “used for better purposes”

    ChatGPT is currently free to use for anyone, this isn’t some technology they’re hoarding and keeping for themselves

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      By usurp I mean fill out all the available capacity for their own use (along with other tech giants who will be running the same moon race), assuming by that time they will be the largest tech giants of the time and have the financial means to do so.

      Don’t get me wrong the things that chatgpt can do are amazing. Even if hallucinates or cant really reason logically, it is still beyond what I would have expected. But when the time I mentioned above comes, people wont be given a choice between AI or cheaper energy/better health care. All that technological advancements will be bought to full capacity by AI companies and AI will be shoved down people’s throats.

      And yes chatgpt is free but it is only a business decision not a “for the good of the humanity” act. free chatgpt helps testing and generating popularity which in turn brings investment. I am not saying anything negative (or positive) about their business plan but dont think for a second that they will have any ethical concerns about leeching upcoming technological innovations for the sake of generating profit. And this is just one company. There will be others too, Amazon, Google, Microsoft etc etc. They will all aggressively try to own as much as possible of these techs as possible leaving only scraps for other uses (therefore making it very expensive to utilise basically).

      • Ignotum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Not sure i’m fully understanding your point, are you saying that the large AI companies will create AIs that will create technologies beyond what everyone else is capable of, thus outcompeting everyone, effectively monopolizing every market and from there basically become the umbrella corporation?

        I would be very impressed if anyone managed to make an AI capable of innovation to that degree, but sure, in that case we would have to fall back on something like government oversight and regulations to keep the companies in check i suppose

        • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          No, other people will generate technologies like quantum computing, fusion energy. Big AI companies will try to own (by buying them out) as much of these as possible because the current model of AI they are using requires these techs to be able to deliver anything significantly better than what they have now. So these tech advancements will basically be owned by AI companies leaving very little room for other uses.

          For these AI companies trying to go toward general AI is risky, as you said above it is not even well defined. On the other hand scaling up their models massively is a well defined goal which however requires major compute and energy innovations like those mentioned above. If these ever happen during like the next ten years or so big tech involved in AI will jump on these and buy as much of it as possible for themselves. And the rest will be mostly bought by governments for military and security applications leaving very little for other public betterment uses.

          • Ignotum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            What if i say big fusion companies will take over the ai market since they have the energy to train better models, seems exactly as likely.

            Remember when GPUs stopped being available because openAI bought nvidia and AMD and took all the gpus for themselves?
            No? Weird, since gpus are needed for them to be able to deliver anything significantly better than what we have now 🤔

            • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              I guess the end result would be the same. But at large the economic system and human nature would be to blame which is actually what I am trying to blame here too, not AI but people in power who abuse AI and steer it towards hype and profit