Influencer platform’s controversial contest awarded prizes to three nonexistent people.

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    rewarding beauty is fine. rewarding beauty in such a way that it has an impact—not only measurable, but significant—against the mental health of the public is not fine.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      rewarding intelligence is fine. rewarding intelligence in such a way that it has an impact—not only measurable, but significant—against the mental health of the public is not fine.

      Let’s stop this malicious practice of giving Nobel prizes!

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        as soon as there is evidence that nobel prizes cause mental health problems i will be saying this lol

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          There’s plenty of evidence that peer and family pressure during studying severely affects mental health of many and often leads to suicides.

          • spujb@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            ok excellent point i will now start calling for reform in academia. :) not sure if banning Nobel prizes is the most effective way but it’s an idea

            also you made some really hateful comments earlier and i forgot to block you oopsie, take care ❤️

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Whether we reward it or not, as long as there is someone people can compare themselves to, it’s going to affect their mental health. Social media itself is a beauty competition, and the reward is attention. We tend to compare up, not down, so it doesn’t really matter how beautiful or rich someone is—there’s always someone doing even better who makes us feel insufficient.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        nope, not at all. having someone to look up to is not the same as a barage of media and advertising soaked with the intent of amplifying and capitalizing off of body dissatisfaction and self hatred.

        • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          If Pixelfed were as popular as Instagram, it would have virtually the same effect on the mental health of young girls, especially. While an advertising-based business model does influence this, it’s not the driving factor. Social comparison is in our genes, but never before have we been able to do it at this scale. This is guaranteed to have a negative effect on mental health. The issue however is not that social media is inherently bad; it’s just incompatible with the way humans behave. It’s like drugs.

          • spujb@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            literally no lol. the advertising (more accurately, the profit-seeking) model is certainly the driving factor, supported by engagement-maximizing algorithms. and remember it’s not just social media i’m criticizing. it’s a much larger media structure including also the show this post is about, and the discussion is much older than instagram, reaching back decades. here, for example, is a study of media exposure and body dissatisfaction from 2003: 7 years before instagram.