… 🫩

    • huppakee@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      3 days ago

      Ikr, it’s like puncing someone in the face and then telling that person now is the moment to stop fighting lol

    • voodooattack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I read a post that said he couldn’t go to war without a vote from congress, was that wrong?

      Edit: I’m not a US citizen so I’m not sure

      • 2piradians@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        3 days ago

        The constitution gives Congress the exclusive power to formally declare war.

        That said, Congress hasn’t declared war since 1942, yet we’ve obviously taken part in many wars since then.

        Sadly there just hasn’t been enough Congressional support to retaliate against a president for jumping to military action without authorization. And it doesn’t help that the average American doesn’t know that the president is not allowed to just deploy troops at will (in most cases, Iran included).

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          If the president can do it without consequences, then he is allowed. Turns out words on paper mean nothing.

      • selfAwareCoder@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s more complicated than it should be, only Congress can declare we are at war, however over the past 200 years they have passed laws allowing the president to do things before that vote out of a sense of being flexible and Congress being slow , and keep allowing more and more things, I think currently the president can do almost anything with the military so long as Congress leaders are told and they then can vote to stop it, instead of voting to approve it.

    • kebab@endlesstalk.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I guess many will disagree but what’s wrong about bombing nuclear sites in countries trying to develop nukes?

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        The intelligence agencies contradicted that narrative. The administration hasn’t made a case that it is actually happening, but have just declared it so.

        Very much rhymes with declaration that Iraq had WMDs.

        As far as evidence goes, it looks like Trump has dragged us into another conflict that we really shouldn’t be in. Which is dissapointing as if there was one small silver lining about Trump was that his rhetoric used to be that we shouldn’t be wasting military resources in middle east conflicts so much.