Follow-up question: was it controversial at the time?

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Aphod’s Believe it or Not (translated from the original Aramaic).

    It was basically a movie about supposed supernatural phenomena. There was a cat with two heads, a horse with no legs, a brief shot of a man walking on water, and a juggler who could make the balls turn into birds.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If your criteria allows for short films and ones from other languages, the five minute film La Passion Du Christ fits. It’s from the 1800’s, which was so long ago people were probably going to drive-in theaters on their horses to see it.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      They’d likely have it in a darkened room instead. Horses don’t have radios so there’s no way to tune in to the audio.

          • saltesc@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Horses not having radios is a tragedy no one should ever joke about. I don’t care how long ago it was. We’ve moved on from such foal nonsense and society’s put it’s hoof down. You either saddle up or bite the bit and accept your joke isn’t mane stream.