Never too young for free speech
deleted by creator
While there are established limits to free speech, the Schenck v US rulling was narrow in scope and doesn’t apply to a little girl drawling a picture in school. If you’re going to cite case law at least find applicable cases and not just pick the 1st one in your search without reading the ruling.
There are many more applicable rulings, mostly to do with how much a school can limit a student’s speech, even those do not cover everything, which is what the Supreme Court is for. Why do liberals constantly forget this? It’s almost like they don’t know constitutional law.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Seems pretty straight forward to me.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Even your linked articlevsays it is. You just cant make specific and clear threats that you have the ability to follow through on.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
This wasnt an obscenity
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
“B.B.'s mom had no idea the punishment had taken place until another parent told her roughly a year after the woke nonsense took place.”
The government should not be keeping secrets from parents.
deleted by creator