General Motors Quits Sharing Driving Behavior With Data Brokers
www.nytimes.com
G.M. had provided information about braking, acceleration and speed to LexisNexis Risk Solution and Verisk, firms that generated driver risk profiles for insurers.

The decision followed a New York Times report this month that G.M. had, for years, been sharing data about drivers’ mileage, braking, acceleration and speed with the insurance industry. The drivers were enrolled — some unknowingly, they said — in OnStar Smart Driver, a feature in G.M.’s internet-connected cars that collected data about how the car had been driven and promised feedback and digital badges for good driving.

If the article link contains a paywall, you can consider reading this alternative article instead: ‘GM Stops Sharing Driver Data With Brokers Amid Backlash’ on Ars Technica.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    8 months ago

    Agreed. Also it reduces costs significantly if issues can be remotely inspected and fixed. Software updates regularly get sent to new vehicles that would have cost a lot of time and money to do at a dealership.

    Yes, they shouldn’t be sharing your data. Yes you should be getting compensated if you opt into data sharing.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        7 months ago

        You can’t have things like airbags, stability control, efficient use of fuel/energy without software.

        We haven’t had software-less cars for decades. As someone that works on older vehicles you don’t want to go back to that era.