An upset Reddit user said they shared several AI art images in a Facebook group and then got banned for posting AI art.

Setting aside the usual arguments on the anti- and pro-AI art debate and the nature of creativity itself, perhaps the negative reaction that the Redditor encountered is part of a sea change in opinion among many people that think corporate AI platforms are exploitive and extractive in nature because their datasets rely on copyrighted material without the original artists’ permission. And that’s without getting into AI’s negative drag on the environment.

  • Daft_ish@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    8 months ago

    Typically, I don’t find anything offensive about the images ai creates. What I do take issue with is the outlandish claims of artistic ownership because they strung some words together.

    • drislands@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      8 months ago

      Agreed. Consider this absolutely batshit take from the reddit post linked in the article.

      Your art looks pretty good, so most people wouldn’t be able to tell it’s AI unless you told them it’s AI.

      Generally it’s always best to just lie and tell everyone you made it yourself, just to avoid all the toxic people that hate AI, because not having to read hateful comments from people like that is reason enough to lie. Don’t need to provide any evidence or go into details, just tell everyone you made it yourself and ignore anyone that question it.

      “Your art”. I’m sure clicking the “regenerate” button on mid journey for 5 hours took lots of work. It’s hard not to feel real hate for these people.