• hitmyspot@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    get it. I dont think we should dismiss using more bandwith as pointless.

    I also think its unreasonable to expect a private company maintain an unprofitable portion of the network. If we wanted coverage like that, it should be part of their licence to ensure its like for like. I dont know stats in Australia but I known in the USA which is more deregulated than here, they are building .ore towers to maintain coverage.

    We are a big country, but as much as the stereotyoe is bush, we have more people in urban areas. That doesn’t make us smaller to provide coverage but I’d be surprised if we aren’t building more towers too. Anybtine there ISNA switch in tech, there will be winners and losers. We need to ensure more winners than losers.

    Dismissing the improvements as unnecessary or unhelpful doesn’t lead to constructive discussion.

    • TinyBreak@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      So you’re not an Aussie? Cool ok so you’ve got no idea what this country is like. That makes sense.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Lol, no. Like most if this country, I live in a metro area.

        Unlike the USA which has a higher percent living rural or in low population density areas. Its juatbthat we alsonhave a lot of empty space.

        Even if I wasnt Australian, my point would still stand, so all youre doing is showing the weakness of yours.